Concerning my match, my matches should be Anal women between the ages of 40 years and 70 years. Yes, I like a woman who receives anal s*x , and I like to penetrate her. This means that I am not into being penetrated, but I like women who receive a variety of *****ism. Furthermore, I am actually looking for a girlfriend who has a wild side, and I am not really looking for an escort or a married woman ( no offense ). Please feel free to reply if you are a matchable woman who is free of disease. We can leave the nastier details for our real date-"skin on skin" and in person.
Concerning threesomes, I would consider doing sexual positions with two, consensual women; however, "two women with one guy" is the limit of my viewpoint on the topic.
What a topic ! lol
Concerning a relationship's goal, I am not beyond a relationship if the woman is compatible, and exoticism is not intended to repel women.Relationships, whether spontaneous or planned,often go through the initial "phases" of inquiry, clarification, inclusion, and intimacy. During these phases, many people will usually share common pursuits as they begin to trust each other. However, this is also an adult site where it is equally appropriate to be somewhat direct or "to the point."
Concerning compatibility and protocol, one area of compatibility is that we are wise enough to slightly disguise the details of our identity until we actually meet our matches in person and "Skin on Skin." Of course, I will include a recognizable tint; however, there is an established protocol for internet dating that makes it safe. One aspect of the protocol is that a person should not disclose too much before the initial,offline meeting in person. Reasons for this protocol are as follows.
1.) Identity Theft is established as a reason for using an alias online.
2.) There could be fanatical , conservative cults who are trying to conduct a resistance narrative / movement against the internet while deceiving people into thinking that they have a big score or something. These fanatical groups would obviously try to slander the members if the member disclosed too much before their match proved to be trustworthy. Nobody wants a "Hidden Agenda."
3.) There have been occasional kooks and sociopaths online. Furthermore, the protocol prevents the possibility of anyone being harmed in the process of an offline meeting in person.
Concerning our initial meeting in person,I was wondering if you are interested in really meeting someone at an offline meeting. Would you like to get together for a "coffee date" in person to see how are chemistry is doing ?
Furthermore,I will risk the analogy of Couple A and Couple B. Couple A met suddenly , and they immediately jumped into bed with each other. This seemed slick; however, Couple A had forgotten that there were a bunch of miserable diseases in the population. Because Couple A had forgotten about the diseases in the population, they sadly infected each other. On the other hand, Couple B met online, and they decided to have a blood test with each other at the local STD clinic so that they could prevent miserable diseases. Because Couple B remembered to have blood test before getting *****, Couple B did their sexual activities without catching any disease. Wow, Couple B has a good way of "hooking up." This makes sense because the STD clinic is often free and not more than $30.00. My perfect evening would be for a matchable woman to meet me for an offline coffee date; then we could carefully screen each other if our chemistry is good. After we pass a blood test together ; then we can pursue the more carnal, exotic issues.
Concerning friendship, I agree that it is very important to maintain friendships, and I think that people should maintain contact with the "old gang" whenever possible. Case in point, it is OK to vent concerning some situations because friends should be there to help each other, and in turn, accept help on occasion. However, there is a very disturbing aspect about today's consensus concerning adulthood, friendship, and marriage. For example, many conservatives try to infer that having good, platonic friends is in trouble. On the contrary , I think that even mature people, who are married, should still go bowling with an old friend on occasion. Unfortunately, this maintenance, of one's old friend, really causes an uproar in the Freudian community. The source of this terrible, paradigm shift is being attempted by the pro-conservative and neo-imperialistic elements. Many groups are trying to exclude people from sexual activity or marriage simply because their parents were not monarchs. Of course, this exclusionary notion is absurd because people are supposed to have equal opportunity and equal rights regardless of who their parent's were. With this said, I am actually a radical democrat and a straight liberal. The terms of a couple's association are only a personal agreement between the couple; however, I do not think that a marriage should exclude the people from the outside world. Are you really the natural woman in the picture on the dating site, or is this another pro-conservative folly ?
